This man had no permission to do anything with this recording.
Have a blessed day,
DTK
Have a blessed day,
DTK
| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
 DTKing |
No permission | #1 | ||
|
Posts: 779 05/21/07 08:51:35 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
NTRMin |
Re: No permission | #2 | ||
|
Posts: 2112 05/21/07 13:09:17 |
By the way, David, I used a point of yours in the debate regarding "the question of the tempter." You included this in a post some time ago, and thought it made the point quite well. It appears close to the end of the closing statement. I think you'll recognize it when you hear it.
ES |
|||
|
|
||||
|
DTKing |
Yes, I recall... | #3 | ||
|
Posts: 779 05/21/07 13:21:01 |
...the point Eric. I hope that it will cause some present at the debate to consider the counter claims of the Roman communion.
I hate it that you did not get to use your PPT presentation. But the fact that you recovered without it is, in itself, a testimony to your abilities in this area. Thanks for your defense of God's truth. Blessings, DTK |
|||
|
|
||||
|
Rhology |
Re: No permission | #4 | ||
|
Posts: 70 05/21/07 13:27:13 |
Pastor King,
I just listened to it and found nothing amiss. He had contacted me before the debate and I sent him the raw file afterwards. He did indeed clean up what he said, as far as I can tell. You are welcome to check the differences between the 2 - see my original post w/ the yousendit.com file and his later. His sounds better; you can listen for anything substantially modified. It sounds good to me, though. My apologies if I did something untoward. I lack the technical know-how to clean up audio files. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
DTKing |
Re: No permission | #5 | ||
|
Posts: 779 05/21/07 13:34:35 |
I should not need to say this, but it never entered my mind that anything was "amiss." I'm sure he probably cleaned it up. The fact is that this is not his to distribute or make available in any way. You had permission, but he didn't. And your having permission does not grant him the same permission. That is my point.
Thanks, DTK Salvian the Presbyter (5th century): But I am afraid that we do not observe them well, do not read them with attention either, because there is less guilt in not reading the Holy Scriptures than in violating them after having read them. To be sure, the other nations either do not have the Law of God, or they have it in a weakened and maimed way, and, therefore, as I have said, they have it in such a manner that they do not have it at all. For, if there are any barbarian nations who in their books seem to have the Holy Scriptures less interpolated or torn into shreds than others, nevertheless they have them as they were corrupted by the tradition of their old teachers. Therefore, they have tradition rather than Scripture. They do not keep what the truth of the Law teaches, but what the wickedness of a bad tradition has inserted. FC, Vol. 3, The Writings of Salvian, The Presbyter, The Governance of God, Book 5.2 (New York: CIMA Publishing Co., Inc., 1947), pp. 129-130.
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Rhology |
Re: No permission | #6 | ||
|
Posts: 70 05/22/07 07:10:10 |
I see, thanks for the clarification.
I apologise for my part in that. |
|||
|
|
||||
Quick Reply
Replies
| Svendsen-Pacwa debate review | 05/18/07 19:51:22 | Rhology |
| Re: Svendsen-Pacwa debate mp3 download | 05/19/07 17:48:01 | Rhology |
| Re: Svendsen-Pacwa debate mp3 download | 05/23/07 04:44:20 | Answerman1 |
| Re: Svendsen-Pacwa debate mp3 download | 05/23/07 13:37:57 | Rhology |
| An "okay" debate | 05/20/07 03:44:52 | NTRMin |
| Infallible lists | 05/20/07 05:23:57 | NTRMin |
| Re: Infallible lists | 05/20/07 12:29:55 | Rhology |
| Re: An "okay" debate | 05/20/07 14:57:52 | Ray Aviles |
| My own longer review | 05/21/07 07:25:13 | Rhology |
| No permission | 05/21/07 08:51:35 | DTKing |
| Re: No permission | 05/21/07 13:09:17 | NTRMin |
| Yes, I recall... | 05/21/07 13:21:01 | DTKing |
| Re: No permission | 05/21/07 13:27:13 | Rhology |
| Re: No permission | 05/21/07 13:34:35 | DTKing |
| Re: No permission | 05/22/07 07:10:10 | Rhology |
